Known Issues in Q2 Release, Part 2
Thursday, July 17, 2008
The Q2 release of the production version of the Client Tool was released earlier this month. Since then we have identified several issues. These known issues also apply to the ECMPS Client Tool Preview (CTP) version 2.
Issue
Invalid LME-33-B error on generation of LME data.
Response
We have identified the problem, corrected it, and are testing the solution. It is has not been determined when this solution will be provided to production users.
Work-Around
There is no work-around for this issue. Instead, until the solution has been provided to users, the errors can be suppressed pending CAMD's approval. After the error has been suppressed, you will no longer receive the incorrect error during the generation of emissions data. In order to request that the error be suppressed, send an email to ecmps-support@camdsupport.com.
Appendix D CO2 and the Formula Identifier
In the emissions evaluation, you might receive an HOURDHV-29-A error which leaves you scratching your head. The reason is that the reporting instructions are not as clear as they should be regarding when the formula identifier should be reported in the Derived Hourly Value (DHV) record.
Response
The instructions simply indicate that the formula identifier that is used for the calculation of the parameter should be reported. For Appendix D CO2, this is partially correct. The formula identifier should be reported if there are multiple fuels for the hour. In other words, if a formula was necessary for the summation, it needs to be reported. However, in the case where there is only a single fuel for the hour, the formula identifier should not be reported.
The reporting instructions will be modified to make it clear when it is necessary to report the formula identifier in the DHV record.
Work-Around
This is not really a work-around so much as modifying the reporting of the DHV record. Only report the formula identifier in the DHV record for hours in which there are multiple fuels.
Issue
Invalid LME-33-B error on generation of LME data.
Response
We have identified the problem, corrected it, and are testing the solution. It is has not been determined when this solution will be provided to production users.
Work-Around
There is no work-around for this issue. Instead, until the solution has been provided to users, the errors can be suppressed pending CAMD's approval. After the error has been suppressed, you will no longer receive the incorrect error during the generation of emissions data. In order to request that the error be suppressed, send an email to ecmps-support@camdsupport.com.
Appendix D CO2 and the Formula Identifier
In the emissions evaluation, you might receive an HOURDHV-29-A error which leaves you scratching your head. The reason is that the reporting instructions are not as clear as they should be regarding when the formula identifier should be reported in the Derived Hourly Value (DHV) record.
Response
The instructions simply indicate that the formula identifier that is used for the calculation of the parameter should be reported. For Appendix D CO2, this is partially correct. The formula identifier should be reported if there are multiple fuels for the hour. In other words, if a formula was necessary for the summation, it needs to be reported. However, in the case where there is only a single fuel for the hour, the formula identifier should not be reported.
The reporting instructions will be modified to make it clear when it is necessary to report the formula identifier in the DHV record.
Work-Around
This is not really a work-around so much as modifying the reporting of the DHV record. Only report the formula identifier in the DHV record for hours in which there are multiple fuels.
Labels: Known Issues